I made a cup of coffee and reviewed potential courses of action. Then I picked up the phone and called LRI's HR department. The letter was signed by the deputy head of HR, but I don't deal with second liners. I asked to speak to the head, a woman I can't stand. She is the kind of person who gives business women a bad name. Vain, aggressive, duplicitous. She congratulates herself that she is playing in the deep pool with the big fish and is too thick to realise that they regard her as their disposable instrument, not their equal. That day she was 'not available' according to her sidekick who volunteered her assistance.
"Tell Sheila that she needs to speak to me now. I'll hold."
"That's not possible, she's in a meeting."
"She'll want to take this call, because if she doesn't, she'll be answering calls from my solicitor and the national newspapers ... not necessarily in that order."
"oh," there was a flustered pause,
"I'll see if I can interrupt her."
When Sheila came on the phone she attempted to take aggressive control of the phone call. I waited until she had run out of words and then, ignoring all that she had already said, asked "What are these allegations, and who made them?"
She tried to evade answering so I just kept repeating the same question until she offered "I think you'd better come into the office and we can discuss this." I smiled.
"I don't think so. This is a matter that requires legal support and witnesses. So we'll meet at my solicitors and you can bring with you all the background to this nonsense, if there is any. You'd better be prepared to name names. I'll ring back with an appointment time." I put the phone down and had a long hard think.
I didn't know any employment law specialists but I do know a man who knows everyone. Mac's a director of a City PR agency and an inexhaustible source of scurrilous (but true) gossip, essential names and very, very hardnosed advice. On an off-the-record basis I traded my knowledge of an unnamed insurance company lurking in the living dead zone, for the name of the top man in unlawful dismissal cases and ten minutes later was talking to my new solicitor, James. And so it was that James and I found ourselves facing Sheila and LRI's in-house solicitor that afternoon. I was glad to see it was the head of the legal department, not an insultingly junior colleague.
James began proceedings by reminding them that I was on sick leave, suffering from stress and suggested their letter amounted to harassment as there was no foundation to it. He's a bit of a stirrer. I really like that in a lawyer. I sat still looking thin and fragile (head swathed in a scarf to hide new hair and blue makeup shadows artfully brushed around my eyes) and said little, as directed by James.
By the end of an unnerving hour, it transpired that the allegations of misconduct had been made against me by a person who was himself the subject of a very high level external investigation, the substance of which could not be revealed to us. I can only hope that person is Vijay but it was clear that both Sheila and the LRI lawyer were completely out of their depth and were not party to that investigation.
It is also clear that no-one wants me back on LRI's premises until the big investigation is concluded and one or more people have been fired/thrown to the wolves/given a huge pay off/promoted or all of the above (cf Fred the Shred). And they want me gagged. I could see that James was having a "Gotcha, you bastards!" moment and thoroughly enjoying this as he launched into the attack. In fact, I was quite worried he would succeed in forcing them to take me back, just when I was looking forward to my leisurely summer under the flysheet. Then I realised that he'd expertly backed them into a corner from which the only way out was a graceful compromise that he proposed. They seized it with both snouts! The letter of suspension is to be formally withdrawn, with an apology; and I am to be granted a six month sabbatical (on full pay including bonus) whilst the other investigation proceeds. Result!
Champagne all round! After long hot baths, intensive clothes washing and general household chores, I shall be returning to my gorse field to try and second guess what is happening at LRI now. At least I don't have to skulk about in hiding from the media since if there are any leaks from the investigation, my name is unlikely to be in the forefront. Of course, if I wish to continue enjoying camping in the woods, I will still have to evade Farmer Giles, Larry the Lumberjack and Simon the Shepherd...
